WorkCover system failing long-term injured workers, Victorian Ombudsman finds in WorkSafe report.


WorkCover system failing long-term injured workers, Victorian Ombudsman finds in WorkSafe report.

Following from the previous post, here is an article from the ABC website with more details highlighting the behaviour some of the Insurers engage in when  dealing with Workers’ entitlements. If you have been injured at work, do get legal advice as to your entitlements to prevent being exposed to this sort of treatment.

Here is the article:

WorkCover system failing long-term injured workers, Victorian Ombudsman finds in WorkSafe report

Victoria’s workers compensation scheme has been failing long-term injured workers in “downright immoral and unethical” circumstances, the state’s ombudsman has found.

Key points:

  • An investigation found instances of claims agents “cherry picking” medical advice to have compensation rejected
  • The ombudsman said claims were being terminated in “wholly unreasonable circumstances”
  • The Government and WorkSafe Victoria accepted her 15 recommendations

In a scathing report following an 18-month investigation, Victorian Ombudsman Deborah Glass found WorkSafe agents were continuing to make unreasonable decisions, in some cases for financial incentives, leaving injured workers without compensation.

The management of WorkCover compensation claims is outsourced by WorkSafe Victoria to five claims agents: Allianz, CGU, EML, Gallagher Bassett and Xchanging.

“They’re terminating claims in wholly unreasonable circumstances,” Ms Glass told ABC Radio Melbourne.

“Agents are making decisions to terminate claims, for example, or require unfair return to work practices that are not only unreasonable and unjust, some of these cases are downright immoral and unethical.”

The investigation focused on complex claims, which mainly involve injured workers who have been off work and receiving compensation for more than 130 weeks. They make up about a quarter of all claims.

The ombudsman found evidence of all five agents ignoring medical advice, “doctor shopping” and “cherry picking” evidence to terminate or reject complex claims.

She found WorkSafe had insufficient oversight of medical advisers hired by agents and referred workers to conciliation or court “despite clearly inadequate or unreasonable agent decision making”.

The agency was “too often unwilling or unable” to deal with the disputes process, she found.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume.

But Ms Glass said the 2016 report “only scratched the surface” and, in some instances, “drove some bad practices underground”.

‘Please don’t put me in the 2022 ombudsman report’

Ms Glass said the system had a “complicated set of financial rewards and penalties” that encouraged the agents to get people off WorkCover.

Agents were congratulated for terminating claims and often referred to outcomes as “wins” and “losses”.

In one email, an EML case manager told a return to work specialist that a case outcome was “another win”.

The specialist replied: “handy 75K made today, no biggie :D”.

In a further email exchange, the specialist joked about depositing a portion of the money into an “offshore Cayman Island account”.

“Worksafe, just joking if you are auditing emails, please don’t put me in the 2022 ombudsman report,” the email continued.

The investigation found injured workers were often required to attend occupational rehabilitation in “wholly unsuitable circumstances”, including a man who was experiencing severe psychotic hallucinations.

Another man, who was homeless at the time, was in hospital after a self-harm attempt but had a non-compliance notice sent to his old home, despite the agent knowing he was homeless.

Agent lied to injured woman about surveillance

In another case, an aged care worker with a severe work-related back injury was put under surveillance by her agent, even though there was no evidence she was misrepresenting her injury.

Although the surveillance footage showed she walked with a limp related to the back injury, the surveillance continued, prompting the woman to ask whether she was being followed.

“The agent denied it and told her that if she was concerned about being followed she ought to go to police,” Ms Glass said.

“This is a woman who not only has an injury but she’s developing a complex mental health condition as a result of that injury. You’d think you were paranoid if that was happening to you.

“We found too many examples of this happening.”

The State Government confirmed it would implement the watchdog’s two recommendations to the Government to commission an independent review of the claims management model and bring in a new dispute resolution process.

WorkSafe accepted a further 13 recommendations, including establishing a dedicated business unit to review disputes.

“The report reveals disturbing examples of injured workers who have been unfairly treated and unjustly denied their legal entitlements,” Jill Hennessy, the Attorney-General and Minister for Workplace Safety, said in a statement.

“It also demonstrates a systemic problem with the current model of claims management for complex claims, and insufficient oversight and review mechanisms.


The article can be found here:

Been injured and seeking compensation?

We can help you whether you've been injured at work, in a motor vehicle collision or due to a defective product or assault. Contact us to talk to one of our lawyers about your case. It's free and confidential.

About the author

kauthenlegal administrator